• 社科网首页
  • 客户端
  • 官方微博
  • 报刊投稿
  • 邮箱

2020年2月14日
  • 首页
  • 本所概况
    哲学所简介

    中国社会科学院哲学研究所是我国哲学学科的重要学术机构和研究中心。其前身是中国科学院哲学社会科学部哲学研究所。历任所长为潘梓年、许立群、邢贲思、汝信(兼)、陈筠泉、李景源、谢地坤。中华人民共和国成立前,全国没有专门的哲学研究机构。为了适应社会主义改造和建设事业发展的需要... ... <详情>

    • 现任领导
    更多+
    • 1.jpg

      张蕾

      党委常委、书记

    • zhangzhiqiang.png

      张志强

      党委常委、 副书记,所长

    • 刘志明一寸1.png

      刘志明

      党委常委, 纪委书记,副所长

    • 微信图片_20240509110053.jpg

      周丹

      党委常委,副所长

    更多+
    • 王立胜

      党委书记、副所长

    • 冯颜利

      党委书记、副所长

    • 张志强

      党委书记、副所长

    • 王立胜

      党委书记、副所长

    组织机构
    更多+

    研究室

    • 习近平文化思想研究室
    • 马克思主义哲学原理研究室
    • 马克思主义哲学史研究室
    • 中国马克思主义哲学研究室
    • 中国哲学研究室
    • 东方哲学研究室
    • 西方哲学史研究室
    • 现代外国哲学研究室
    • 美学研究室
    • 伦理学研究室
    • 科学技术哲学研究室
    • 逻辑学研究室
    • 智能与逻辑实验室

    科研辅助

    • 《哲学研究》编辑部
    • 《哲学动态》与《中国哲学年鉴》编辑部
    • 《世界哲学》编辑部
    • 图书资料室

    职能处室

    • 人事处
    • 办公室
    • 科研处

    社团学会

    研究中心

  • 党建工作
    历史沿革

    哲学研究所现行的领导体制是党委领导下的所长负责制。此前曾实行过党支部、党的领导小组、党总支、党委、机关党委、分党组、联合党委等领导形式。
    1955年4月,哲学所成立第一届党支部,周宜明担任支部书记,下半年党支部增设宣传委员和组织委员,李奇担任宣传委员,鲁孝文担任组织委员。<详情>

    党建专栏
    更多+
    • 123fuben.png
    • 演示文稿1_01.png
    • 1713345686886.jpg
    • 微信图片_20240227160931.png
    • 1681457326940.png
    • 微信图片_20221102154829.jpg
    离退休工作
    更多+
    • 哲学研究所举办离退休干部2025年度春季讲坛...
    • 哲学研究所春节前夕走访慰问离退休干部
    • 杨远同志生平
    • 杨远同志讣告
    • 哲学研究所离退休老同志开展秋季户外活动
    工会、青年工作
    更多+
    • 展现女性哲人独特风采 聚焦女性哲人睿智力量——...
    • 关于做好我所甲型H1N1流感防控工作的通知
    • 青年哲学论坛暨哲学所建所55周年系列学术报告会
  • 研究学人
    已故名家
    更多+
    • panzinian.jpg潘梓年
    • jinyuelin.jpg金岳霖
    • 贺麟.jpg贺麟
    • 杜任之.jpg杜任之
    • 容肇祖.jpg容肇祖
    • 沈有鼎.jpg沈有鼎
    • wubaihui.jpg巫白慧
    • 杨一之.jpg杨一之
    荣誉学部委员
    更多+
    • 徐崇温(大图).png徐崇温
    • 陈筠泉(编辑图).png陈筠泉
    • 姚介厚.jpg姚介厚
    学部委员
    更多+
    • 李景源.jpg李景源
    • 赵汀阳4.jpg赵汀阳
    本所同仁

    在职学者

    • 正高级
    • 副高级
    • 中 级
    • 初 级

    离退休学者

  • 科研工作
    学科建设
    更多+
    • 马克思主义哲学
    • 中国哲学
    • 西方哲学
    • 东方哲学
    • 伦理学
    • 逻辑学
    • 科学技术哲学
    • 美学
    • 文化哲学
    学术动态
    更多+
    • 研究阐释中华文明突出特性 构建中国哲学自主知识体系
    • 哲学研究所贾泽林、王柯平、詹文杰获2024年翻译界...
    • 哲学所“中国哲学学科团队”获评“首届中国社会科...
    • 我所1项课题获2020年度国家社科基金后期资助项目立项
    • 我所5项课题获2020年度国家社科基金年度项目和青年...
    论著评介
    更多+
    • 李薇著《从道德感到同情:18世纪英国道德情感主义...
    • 田时纲译《狱中札记》(第一卷)
    • 赵汀阳著《秩序的理由》
    • 王幸华译《大哲学家》
    • 闫培宇著《解构主义视野中的西方现代性——重估马...
    学术争鸣
    更多+
    • 【周丹】中国哲学的自主性
    • 【刘志明】推动物质文明和精神文明协调发展
    • 【杨洪源】新时代文化建设的科学指南和根本遵循
    • 【李俊文 张乙】对马尔库塞“单向度”批判的批判
    • 【董键铭】对经济与文化关系的历史唯物主义反思
    获奖、成果
    • 重大会议、论坛
    • 重大研究项目
    • 学者资助计划
    • 中国社会科学院优秀科研成果奖
    • 哲学所优秀科研成果奖
    • 哲学所青年哲学论坛获奖
    • 贺麟青年哲学奖
  • 学术期刊
    • 哲学研究 1739515365518.jpg
    • 哲学动态 哲学动态.png
    • 世界哲学 1744940280995.jpg
    • 中国哲学年鉴 中国哲学年鉴.png
    • 中国哲学史 W020200520604858941756.jpg
  • 人才培养
    博士后
    更多+
    ttpt003.jpg
    • 中国社会科学院博士后工作管理规定
    • 《中国社会科学院博士后工作管理规定》实施细则
    • 中国社会科学院博士后经费使用与管理办法
    • 哲学研究所关于博士后工作的管理办法
    • 2012年中国社会科学院哲学研究所博士后流动站...
    青年哲学论坛
    更多+
    ttpt004.jpg
    • 青年哲学论坛
    访问学者
    更多+
    • 中国社会科学院哲学研究所国内访问学者招收简章
    中英美暑期哲学学院
    更多+
    • 中英美暑期哲学学院第23期高级研讨班在华东师范大...
    • 中英美暑期哲学学院第22期高级研讨班在首都师范大...
    • 中英美暑期哲学学院第21期高级研讨班在中国人民大...
    • 中英美暑期哲学学院第20期高级研讨班在深圳大学举行
    • PHILOSOPHY SUMMER SCHOOL IN CHINA EXAMINERS' RE...
  • 图书档案
    图书馆简介

    哲学专业书库的前身是哲学研究所图书馆,与哲学研究所同时成立于1955年。1994年底,院所图书馆合并之后将其划为哲学所自管库,从此只保留图书借阅流通业务,不再购进新书。

    2009年1月16日,作为中国社会科学院图书馆体制机制改革的重要举措之一,哲学专业书库正式挂牌。

    <详情>
    • 中国社会科学院哲学研究所哲学专业书库藏书特色简介
    • 哲学书库——几代馆人竭尽心力完整系统收藏书
    • 图书室藏书凝聚着科研人员的心血与汗水
    • 中国社会科学院哲学研究所图书室馆藏哲学书刊简况
    哲学学科服务
    更多+
    • 中文社会科学常用核心期刊目录来源
    • 中国社会科学院哲学研究所图书室馆藏哲学书刊简况
    • 哲学书库——几代馆人竭尽心力完整系统收藏书
    • 图书室藏书凝聚着科研人员的心血与汗水
    特色馆藏
    更多+
    • 【高颖 兰倩】四库底本《记纂渊海》考略
    • 傅兰雅与《格致汇编》
  • 哲学系
    哲学系简介

    哲学系以中国社会科学院哲学研究所为依托,成立于1978年。中国社会科学院哲学研究所为国家级专业研究学术机构。1955年成立中国科学院哲学社会科学部后,哲学所便开始招收培养研究生,因“文革”一度停止招生。自1978年中国社会科学院成立以来...<详情>

    哲学系动态
    更多+
    • 哲学院成功举办“深化科教融合,做好本科生教学和...
    • 哲学院召开2021年度春季工作会议
    • 第二届“中华传统文化民生奖学金”楼宇烈民生奖学...
    招生信息
    更多+
    • 2025年哲学院博士研究生招生综合考核结果公示
    • 2025年哲学院硕士研究生招生复试结果公示
    • 2025年中国社会科学院大学哲学院硕士研究生招生复试考生名单
    • 2025年中国社会科学院大学哲学院硕士研究生招生复试录取工作方案
    • 中国社会科学院大学2025年哲学院招收博士生入围综合考核名单公示
    表格下载
    更多+
    • 中国社会科学院大学硕士研究生招生思想政治素...
    • 报考导师意向表
    • 中国社会科学院大学研究生招生体格检查表
    • 2025年中国社会科学院大学哲学院哲学专业博士...
    • 中国社会科学院大学哲学院2025年博士研究生招...
    • 师资队伍
    • 学生名录
    • 常用链接
    • 联系我们

您当前的位置:首页>科研工作>学术争鸣>西方哲学

学术争鸣

  • 马克思主义哲学
  • 中国哲学
  • 西方哲学
  • 东方哲学
  • 伦理学
  • 逻辑学
  • 科学技术哲学
  • 美学
  • 文化哲学

【赵汀阳】A Tianxia system as a possible world for the future

发布时间: 2023-07-14
【字号 +字号 -】

About the author:

ZHAO Tingyang

Professor of philosophy at Chinese Academy of Social Sciences. Senior fellow at Berggruen Institute. Working on ontology, political philosophy and philosophy of history. His book on Tianxia theory has been translated into other languages, including Alles Unter dem Himmel (Suhrkamp, Germany);All-under-heaven:The Tianxia System for a Possible World Order (Univ. California, USA); Tianxia tout sous un Meme Ciel (Cerf, France); Redefining a Philosophy for World Governance (Palgrave-Macmillan, UK);Tianxia: una filosofia para la gobernanza global( Herder, Spain); Tutto Sotto il Cielo (Ubalddini, Italy); Nowa Filozofia ladu Swiatowego (Time Marszalek, Poland). As well as the co-author books including Un Dieu ou tous les Dieux (Cent Mille, France, co-author with Alain Le Pichon);Du Ciel ala Terre (Les Arenes, France, co-author with Regis Debray).

 

作者简介:

赵汀阳,中国社会科学院学部委员,哲学研究所研究员。著有《论可能生活》、《天下体系》、《一个或所有问题》、《第一哲学的支点》、《坏世界研究》、《天下的当代性》、《惠此中国》、《历史,山水,渔樵》等,部分著作译为Alles Unter dem Himmel (Suhrkamp,德国);Tianxia tout sous un Meme Ciel(Cerf,法国);All-under-heaven:The Tianxia System for a Possible World Order (Univ. California,美国);Redefining a Philosophy for World Governance (Palgrave-Macmillan,英国);Tianxia: Una filosofia para la gobernanza global(Herder, 西班牙); Tutto Sotto il Cielo (Ubalddini, 意大利);Nowa Filozofia ladu Swiatowego (Time Marszalek, 波兰), 以及合著Un Dieu ou tous les Dieux (Cent Mille, 法国,与A. Le Pichon 合著);Du Ciel ala Terre (Les Arenes, 法国,与R. Debray 合著)。

 

Aristotle-Confucius symposium at Greece

A Tianxia system as a possible world for the future

 

Zhao Tingyang

We talk about the world as if it is there. We do have a physical world, but politically or culturally, it is a non-world in anarchy, not far from the Hobbesian state of nature, full of terrors, hostilities and clashes of civilizations. The world has good reason to expect a new concept to make it a “best possible world”.

 

Leibniz uses the “best possible world” to explain the God’s creation of the physical world with the “compossibility” of the richest collection of things. It is a great ontology, almost equals to the ontology of I Ching, the Chinese bible, which emphasizes the “compatibility” of all things. And it should have inspired the 3,000 years old concept of a world system in terms of Tianxia, literally a system of “all-under-heaven”, which defines an all-inclusive world of “no outside”[1]with “great harmony”[2] of all peoples or “compatibility of all nations”[3]. It is an amazing and open question why China had begun its politics with the imagination of a world system as Tianxia while Greek with polis, the two most significant starting points of politics.

 

Conceptually, Tianxia consists of threefold worlds: the physical world, the earth where men live; the psychological world, as the agreement of all peoples; and a political world, a universal system of-and-for the world. I would redefine a contemporary concept of a new Tianxia for the future, with a renewed formula of the three overlapping worlds: the political, the ethical and the epistemological, which are closely related. A political world is also reflected in the ethical and the epistemological, and vice-versa.

 

Two compelling reasons for my reinvention of Tianxia. The first, we have to solve the problem of Huntington’s clashes of civilizations, which indicates the failure of civilization. The second, we should avoid the failure of international politics, a game with hostile and ineffective strategies of deterrence, sanction, interference, the balancing of powers, actually making the world even worse. And UN does not help so much, for it is not a world system, no more than an international sphere for international disputes, essentially pertaining to the international system and confined to the concept of international politics.

 

Tianxia suggests an alternative concept of the political as the art of changing hostility into hospitality, instead of Carl Schmitt’s recognition of enemy, Morgenthau’ struggle for power, or Huntington’s clashes of civilizations. The reason is simple but strong: if politics cannot stop hostility, it is no politics, nothing more than war. And war proves the failure of politics rather than the continuation of politics as Carl Von Clausewitz thinks.

 

A new concept of Tianxia to make a world claims three constitutional concepts: (1) internalization of the world, a shared universal system inclusive of all nations, so that making a world of no more negative externalities; (2) relational rationality, which emphasizes the priority of mutual minimization of hostility above maximization of exclusive interest; And (3) Confucian Improvement, which is the non-exclusive improvement for everyone, better than Pareto’s Improvement, and defined as one improved if-and-only-if all others improved. Confucian Improvement means everyone gets a Pareto’s improvement if anyone gets it, or each one gets a Pareto’s Improvement at the same time. A new Tianxia is hopefully to make a better world system, based upon world constitution, to solve the global problems such as technological risks, global financial problems, climate change, pandemics and clashes of civilizations.

 

In consistency with the Tianxia system, the global ethics would expect a better “Golden Rule” than that in Christianity or Confucianism. The traditional golden rule that says “Never do to others whatever you would not like others to do to you” is nearly perfect except its limitation of a unilateral subjective horizon, which problematically implies that the “I” has the one-sided authority to decide the universal concepts of goodness or truth. I would rewrite the Golden Rule as “Never do to others whatever others would not like you to do to them”. This new rule is strictly reciprocal and symmetric, thus truly universal.

 

A Tianxia system should also be realized in epistemological sphere. I am thinking of a concept of a new encyclopedia, inspired by the French project of encyclopedia in 18th century, and now likely to be supported by internet and AI. It means a methodology of knowledge rather than a physical book, and meant to include all knowledge from all civilizations with equal respect and reciprocal recognition. The epistemological paths of the new encyclopedia will begin with the shared questions or the common concerns, instead of the one-sided agenda by the western knowledge. This seemingly impossible epistemological scheme will be made possible in the coming AI world.

 

注:

[1] 《春秋·公羊传·隐公元年》。

[2] 《礼记·礼运》。

[3] 《尚书·尧典》。

 

来源:Aristotle-Confucius symposium on Ethics for the 21st Century




分享到
友情链接 中国社会科学网 哲学中国网 中国儒学网 上海社会科学院哲学研究所 清华大学哲学系 更多>>

地址:北京市东城区建国门内大街5号邮编:100732

电话:(010)85195506 传真:(010)65137826 E-mail:philosophy@cass.org.cn

版权所有 中国社会科学院哲学研究所 京ICP备20004808号
  • 微信

    《哲学中国》

    《哲学研究》

    《哲学动态》

    《世界哲学》

首页

本所概况

  • 哲学所介绍
  • 组织机构
  • 历任领导
  • 现任领导
  • 历史资料
  • 通知公告
  • 新闻资讯
  • 人才招聘

党建工作

  • 历史沿革
  • 组织机构
  • 全面从严治党专栏
  • 政策方针
  • 党建专栏
  • 离退休工作
  • 工会、青年工作

研究学人

  • 荣誉学部委员
  • 学部委员
  • 本所同仁
  • 历史名家

科研工作

  • 学科建设
  • 学术动态
  • 论著评介
  • 学术争鸣
  • 获奖、成果
  • 重大会议、论坛
  • 重大研究项目
  • 学者资助计划

学术期刊

  • 哲学研究
  • 哲学动态
  • 世界哲学
  • 中国哲学年鉴
  • 中国哲学史

人才培养

  • 博士后
  • 访问学者
  • 青年哲学论坛
  • 中英美暑期学院

图书档案

  • 图书馆简介
  • 哲学学科服务
  • 特色馆藏

哲学系

  • 哲学系简介
  • 哲学系动态
  • 招生信息
  • 表格下载
  • 师资队伍
  • 学生名录
  • 常用链接
  • 联系我们
点击搜索
西方哲学
  • · 马克思主义哲学
  • · 中国哲学
  • · 西方哲学
  • · 东方哲学
  • · 伦理学
  • · 逻辑学
  • · 科学技术哲学
  • · 美学
  • · 文化哲学

【赵汀阳】A Tianxia system as a possible world for the future

发布日期: 2023-07-14

About the author:

ZHAO Tingyang

Professor of philosophy at Chinese Academy of Social Sciences. Senior fellow at Berggruen Institute. Working on ontology, political philosophy and philosophy of history. His book on Tianxia theory has been translated into other languages, including Alles Unter dem Himmel (Suhrkamp, Germany);All-under-heaven:The Tianxia System for a Possible World Order (Univ. California, USA); Tianxia tout sous un Meme Ciel (Cerf, France); Redefining a Philosophy for World Governance (Palgrave-Macmillan, UK);Tianxia: una filosofia para la gobernanza global( Herder, Spain); Tutto Sotto il Cielo (Ubalddini, Italy); Nowa Filozofia ladu Swiatowego (Time Marszalek, Poland). As well as the co-author books including Un Dieu ou tous les Dieux (Cent Mille, France, co-author with Alain Le Pichon);Du Ciel ala Terre (Les Arenes, France, co-author with Regis Debray).

 

作者简介:

赵汀阳,中国社会科学院学部委员,哲学研究所研究员。著有《论可能生活》、《天下体系》、《一个或所有问题》、《第一哲学的支点》、《坏世界研究》、《天下的当代性》、《惠此中国》、《历史,山水,渔樵》等,部分著作译为Alles Unter dem Himmel (Suhrkamp,德国);Tianxia tout sous un Meme Ciel(Cerf,法国);All-under-heaven:The Tianxia System for a Possible World Order (Univ. California,美国);Redefining a Philosophy for World Governance (Palgrave-Macmillan,英国);Tianxia: Una filosofia para la gobernanza global(Herder, 西班牙); Tutto Sotto il Cielo (Ubalddini, 意大利);Nowa Filozofia ladu Swiatowego (Time Marszalek, 波兰), 以及合著Un Dieu ou tous les Dieux (Cent Mille, 法国,与A. Le Pichon 合著);Du Ciel ala Terre (Les Arenes, 法国,与R. Debray 合著)。

 

Aristotle-Confucius symposium at Greece

A Tianxia system as a possible world for the future

 

Zhao Tingyang

We talk about the world as if it is there. We do have a physical world, but politically or culturally, it is a non-world in anarchy, not far from the Hobbesian state of nature, full of terrors, hostilities and clashes of civilizations. The world has good reason to expect a new concept to make it a “best possible world”.

 

Leibniz uses the “best possible world” to explain the God’s creation of the physical world with the “compossibility” of the richest collection of things. It is a great ontology, almost equals to the ontology of I Ching, the Chinese bible, which emphasizes the “compatibility” of all things. And it should have inspired the 3,000 years old concept of a world system in terms of Tianxia, literally a system of “all-under-heaven”, which defines an all-inclusive world of “no outside”[1]with “great harmony”[2] of all peoples or “compatibility of all nations”[3]. It is an amazing and open question why China had begun its politics with the imagination of a world system as Tianxia while Greek with polis, the two most significant starting points of politics.

 

Conceptually, Tianxia consists of threefold worlds: the physical world, the earth where men live; the psychological world, as the agreement of all peoples; and a political world, a universal system of-and-for the world. I would redefine a contemporary concept of a new Tianxia for the future, with a renewed formula of the three overlapping worlds: the political, the ethical and the epistemological, which are closely related. A political world is also reflected in the ethical and the epistemological, and vice-versa.

 

Two compelling reasons for my reinvention of Tianxia. The first, we have to solve the problem of Huntington’s clashes of civilizations, which indicates the failure of civilization. The second, we should avoid the failure of international politics, a game with hostile and ineffective strategies of deterrence, sanction, interference, the balancing of powers, actually making the world even worse. And UN does not help so much, for it is not a world system, no more than an international sphere for international disputes, essentially pertaining to the international system and confined to the concept of international politics.

 

Tianxia suggests an alternative concept of the political as the art of changing hostility into hospitality, instead of Carl Schmitt’s recognition of enemy, Morgenthau’ struggle for power, or Huntington’s clashes of civilizations. The reason is simple but strong: if politics cannot stop hostility, it is no politics, nothing more than war. And war proves the failure of politics rather than the continuation of politics as Carl Von Clausewitz thinks.

 

A new concept of Tianxia to make a world claims three constitutional concepts: (1) internalization of the world, a shared universal system inclusive of all nations, so that making a world of no more negative externalities; (2) relational rationality, which emphasizes the priority of mutual minimization of hostility above maximization of exclusive interest; And (3) Confucian Improvement, which is the non-exclusive improvement for everyone, better than Pareto’s Improvement, and defined as one improved if-and-only-if all others improved. Confucian Improvement means everyone gets a Pareto’s improvement if anyone gets it, or each one gets a Pareto’s Improvement at the same time. A new Tianxia is hopefully to make a better world system, based upon world constitution, to solve the global problems such as technological risks, global financial problems, climate change, pandemics and clashes of civilizations.

 

In consistency with the Tianxia system, the global ethics would expect a better “Golden Rule” than that in Christianity or Confucianism. The traditional golden rule that says “Never do to others whatever you would not like others to do to you” is nearly perfect except its limitation of a unilateral subjective horizon, which problematically implies that the “I” has the one-sided authority to decide the universal concepts of goodness or truth. I would rewrite the Golden Rule as “Never do to others whatever others would not like you to do to them”. This new rule is strictly reciprocal and symmetric, thus truly universal.

 

A Tianxia system should also be realized in epistemological sphere. I am thinking of a concept of a new encyclopedia, inspired by the French project of encyclopedia in 18th century, and now likely to be supported by internet and AI. It means a methodology of knowledge rather than a physical book, and meant to include all knowledge from all civilizations with equal respect and reciprocal recognition. The epistemological paths of the new encyclopedia will begin with the shared questions or the common concerns, instead of the one-sided agenda by the western knowledge. This seemingly impossible epistemological scheme will be made possible in the coming AI world.

 

注:

[1] 《春秋·公羊传·隐公元年》。

[2] 《礼记·礼运》。

[3] 《尚书·尧典》。

 

来源:Aristotle-Confucius symposium on Ethics for the 21st Century

Top

中国社会科学院哲学研究所-版权所有